Please send news and comments to: email@example.com
Link to new EMSNow video interview by Philip Stoten at IPC PCB EXPO 2014 (9 minutes): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVOPMgbZ6kA
Masamitsu "Matt" Aoki has updated his detailed charts of "Build-Up Types of Printed Wiring Boards and Their Applications in Japan" (Version 14.1) and "Thin Types of Printed Wiring Boards and Their Applications in Japan" (Version 24.1). They are both now current through June 2014.
Write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org if you wish a copy.
The Taiwan Printed Circuit Association (TPCA) announced at a press conference attended by nearly 100 members of the government, industry, research institutes, academia and the media that it will publish a White Paper in September to address the future Taiwan PCB industry challenges - both in Taiwan as well as China. It will take on production constraints, labor shortages (including skilled and semi-skilled), and end-of-market changes.
The TPCA is calling for its government to lead the country's PCB industry to develop next-generation products and to promote (sponsor?) industry upgrades. Taiwan's PCB makers have lost its momentum and are likely to generate a CAGR of only 1.2% in the 2010-2014 period. The targeted goal for 2014-2020 was said to be 6% to 7%. Sales of Taiwan owned production at home and abroad (including China) is forecast to be $18.3 billion this year.
Everything has a life cycle: You, your company, your products, your services. Are YOU looking at YOUR end-of-life changes? Do you truly understand your markets, your competition, its drivers and what creates opportunities? Do you have a strategy that will enhance/extend it? Are you working to obsolete/replace it before your competitors or the marketplace does?
May we help you do this?
Dateline July 23, 2014 5:40PM EST
It is with great sadness and deep regret that I must inform you of the passing this morning of Dieter Bergman, Global Industry Icon of the printed circuit industry, colleague, and friend of the past half century. He worked selflessly and tirelessly with great charm and wit his entire life in behalf of the industry, enabling the impossible to become the possible. The accolades that are sure to follow will be dwarfed by his actual accomplishments.
Do Not Penalize! - Motivate! Incentivize! Negotiate! License!
Renewable energy is the way of the future. Make no mistake about it. Achieving a cost effective path is the challenge. Slamming China and Taiwan with enormous duties on assembled solar PV panels shipped to the USA is the wrong approach. We should be grateful for the support of China's and Taiwan's governments to their industry that allows us to buy them cheaply. The whole industry is based on government subsidies. The net effect of this new DOC action is to increase prices to the American consumer. The U.S. government has thrown away hundreds of millions of dollars by investing in unproven, doomed-to-fail companies during the past few years. It should have been providing job creating tax incentives for the manufacture of such panels in America.
Let's see if the USA will be the first to commercialize (in high volume) the very efficient multi-juncture PV solar panel technology shown at the recent SEMICON in San Francisco.
Wake up America! It has been 5 years since we have been the world's leading innovator!
Report: The United States not even close to being top global innovator By Pam Tobey July 23 at 5:39 AM - Source: The Washington Post
Switzerland is a four-time champ when it comes to global innovation. The United States? Not so much lately — the country last achieved that spot in 2009. The United Kingdom jumped ahead of Sweden to claim the No. 2 spot behind Switzerland in the recently released Global Innovation Index 2014, put out jointly by the business school INSEAD, the World Intellectual Property Organization, and Cornell University.
The index covers many variables that contribute to innovation, including institutions, human capital and research, infrastructure, market and business sophistication, knowledge and technology and creativity. It gathers data for 81 different indicators in 143 economies to come up with rankings. In 2007, the United States was at the top of the list. In 2010, it plummeted to 11th place, partially due to the battering of the economy by the financial crisis. Among the regions in the report, Europe holds the top spot, followed by North America.
Have you wondered what happened to all those great new product introductions from the IPC APEX, Productronica, HKPCA, CPCA, TPCA, NEPCON and other trade shows around the world the past 3 to 5 years?
Well, I have been wondering, reflecting, interviewing, and thinking. Every inventor's product is his "baby". It is difficult to face reality and listen to advice when one is emotionally attached.
Have most inventors determined the commercial viability of a “new” product, or how to make it so before the product launch? Apparently not. How long, from date of introduction should an invention or improvement take to begin to realize its potential? Three years? Less? What does it take to achieve it? When are incremental changes “good enough” to extend a product’s life cycle or propel it forward? What is the true cost of the “beneficial” change? What is the risk versus reward to the buyer and his customer? What is the projected life cycle of the replacement technology? What is needed to drive demand upwards broadly and rapidly to attain its goals and go beyond the inventor’s dreams?
The answer to these and other vital questions appear to continue to elude many participants and “wannabe’s” in the board fabrication and packaging supply chain.
A number of promising, “revolutionary”, “game-changing” technologies, systems, and products for bare board fabrication have been introduced at major trade shows around the world during the past 3 to 5 or more years. Their companies bear such names as Aiscent Technologies, Semblant, Rainbow, MIVA Technologies, Interdyne (gone as of June 23), and Long Victory Technology (a rising star?).
Why haven’t they become main stream yet? Is it too soon for a post mortem of their activities as well as others of their ilk? Can the right strategic or technical shift or a new alliance renew the hoped-for trajectory? Has the market changed bypassing the creation's need? Were the benefits properly assessed, evaluated, and marketed?
What is YOUR organization’s situation/plan? Can you truly differentiate yourself from the past? From the competition? Can we help you improve your odds? Increase your success rate?
Who will share in IBM’s vision of the future?
During the next 5 years IBM will invest $3 billion in R&D for “the post silicon era”. Which equipment and material suppliers will partner with it? Who else has such a forward looking budget? According to CIO Bernie Meyerson, the investments include programs in areas such as III-V materials expected to be used around the 5nm node, which some say could be the last generation of silicon-based chip technology. They also include a broad set of programs ranging from 3D chip packaging to computer architectures such as quantum and neural processing and post-silicon chip materials such as carbon nanotubes and graphene. "This is not about semiconductors per se but a broad statement about reinventing computing," he said. Today’s silicon CMOS processes will hit atomic limits (a brick wall) somewhere around the 5nm node in about 2020. Many of the IBM programs are about finding new techniques that will drive hardware performance beyond that point. "The real issue is silicon goes quantum mechanical at these dimensions. It no longer works. At this time, there is no consensus on what's next." However, "we still have a 5-10 year horizon” to find solutions.
Someone forgot to tell them...